> On Dec 25, 2023, at 10:44, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> wrote:
> Functions with same name in different schemas would need to be dealt with.
I think that's the primary use-case (at least, it would be for me), and I don't see a convenient way of doing that. Even a "get OID of current function" function would be useful here.