Re: Vacuum verbose output?

From: Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Julian Scarfe <julian(dot)scarfe(at)ntlworld(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Vacuum verbose output?
Date: 2003-01-15 09:42:41
Message-ID: 91aa2vo2d1pa257um4p82n84pt6i5nn5de@4ax.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On 14 Jan 2003 10:54:29 -0500, Robert Treat
<xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> wrote:
>Changed = the number of pages that had to be modified.

This counts only pages changed due to heap tuple header updates
(FrozenTransactionId, hint bits). It does not count page changes due
to removal of dead tuples, cf. Julian's log:

| NOTICE: Pages 342: Changed 0, Empty 0; Tup 8325: Vac 838, Keep 0, UnUsed 5614.
| [...]
| NOTICE: Pages 361: Changed 0, Empty 0; Tup 8229: Vac 1111, Keep 0, UnUsed 5981.

I don't know whether this is intentional or just an oversight. If it
is the latter, let me know and I'll send a patch.

Servus
Manfred

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message dev 2003-01-15 10:02:57 Re: Wrong query execution.
Previous Message frbn 2003-01-15 08:14:06 (no subject)

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Justin Clift 2003-01-15 14:20:53 Re: Anyone have a fresh Solaris 8 SPARC system to create
Previous Message Viacheslav N Tararin 2003-01-15 09:33:31 WIn32 port