Re: Amcheck verification of GiST and GIN

From: Jose Arthur Benetasso Villanova <jose(dot)arthur(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrey Borodin <amborodin86(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Nikolay Samokhvalov <samokhvalov(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Amcheck verification of GiST and GIN
Date: 2023-01-14 03:34:38
Message-ID: 91a841f1-3ecb-dc25-cc62-32153b135c8a@benetasso.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Fri, 13 Jan 2023, Andrey Borodin wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 3:46 AM Jose Arthur Benetasso Villanova
> <jose(dot)arthur(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> The only thing that I found is the gin_index_parent_check function in docs
>> still references the "gin_index_parent_check(index regclass,
>> heapallindexed boolean) returns void"
>>
>
> Correct! Please find the attached fixed version.
>
> Thank you!
>
> Best regards, Andrey Borodin.
>

Hello again. I see the change. Thanks

--
Jose Arthur Benetasso Villanova

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2023-01-14 03:39:41 Re: Decoupling antiwraparound autovacuum from special rules around auto cancellation
Previous Message Andres Freund 2023-01-14 02:27:24 Re: How to find the number of cached pages for a relation?