Re: shared_buffer optimization

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
Cc: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: shared_buffer optimization
Date: 2006-08-09 22:37:00
Message-ID: 919.1155163020@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

"Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> writes:
> Every single piece of advice I've seen on shared_buffers comes from the
> 7.x era, when our buffer management was extremely simplistic. IMO all of
> that knowledge was made obsolete when 8.0 came out, and our handling of
> shared_buffers has improved ever further since then. This is definately
> an area that could use a lot more testing.

Actually I think it was probably 8.1 that made the significant
difference there, by getting rid of the single point of contention
for shared-buffer management. I concur that 7.x-era rules of thumb
may well be obsolete --- we need some credible scaling tests ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steve Poe 2006-08-09 23:47:10 Re: Postgresql Performance on an HP DL385 and
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-08-09 22:26:50 Re: BUG #2567: High IOWAIT