Re: I: About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Leonardo F <m_lists(at)yahoo(dot)it>, Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: I: About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch
Date: 2010-10-08 00:33:03
Message-ID: 9173.1286497983@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> BTW, we could have LogicalTapeReadExact() as an alias of
> LogicalTapeRead() and checking the result because we have
> many duplicated codes for "unexpected end of data" errors.

Good idea, done.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message KaiGai Kohei 2010-10-08 00:39:12 Re: security hook on table creation
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-10-08 00:10:52 Re: I: About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch