Re: Calculage avg. width when operator = is missing

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: "Shulgin, Oleksandr" <oleksandr(dot)shulgin(at)zalando(dot)de>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Calculage avg. width when operator = is missing
Date: 2015-09-22 21:43:56
Message-ID: 9162.1442958236@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> In any case I think your patch is a good starting point.

The comments seemed to need some wordsmithing, but I think this is
probably basically a good idea; we've had similar complaints before
about some other equality-less datatypes, such as point.

Should we consider this HEAD-only, or a back-patchable bug fix?
Or perhaps compromise on HEAD + 9.5?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2015-09-22 21:56:54 Re: Calculage avg. width when operator = is missing
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2015-09-22 21:17:33 Re: Calculage avg. width when operator = is missing