Re: Bad order of Postgres links in Google search results and how to fix it

From: Damien Clochard <damien(at)dalibo(dot)info>
To: Nikolay Samokhvalov <samokhvalov(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: obartunov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru, PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bad order of Postgres links in Google search results and how to fix it
Date: 2018-08-01 09:40:59
Message-ID: 915a28bec225c6a9c7fb549db23dd99f@dalibo.info
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

Le 31.07.2018 10:57, Nikolay Samokhvalov a écrit :
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 6:35 AM Oleg Bartunov
> <obartunov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
>
>> The problem is well known for a long time, for example, this thread
>> from 2009
>>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/1252074856.13736.17.camel%40fsopti579.F-Secure.com
>>
>> It might helps if we generate sitemap.xml
>> (https://www.postgresql.org/sitemap.xml) with links
>> to the pages in "right" order.
>
> Sitemaps won't be really useful here since their primary goal is to
> deliver up-to-date lists of pages to search engines, with lastmod
> timestamps.
>
> To influence on the search engines, it is very important to change the
> real structure of website, to rework existing navigation for humans.
> This is the key to solve this problem. The problem is not huge –
> I've shown "good" examples in my original email and explained why they
> are "good".
>
> We need to fix real users' behaviour – the most imporant thing is
> what people use when they share documentation URLs in social networks,
> blogs and articles.

+1

For the record, Google provides some tools (links below) to understand
how a website is perceived and gives hindsight on how to improve search
results :

https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/
https://search.google.com/search-console

--
Damien Clochard

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2018-08-09 20:38:40 Re: PG list descriptions
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-07-31 19:03:40 Re: Missing mail list archive items