Re: Quick-and-dirty compression for WAL backup blocks

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Quick-and-dirty compression for WAL backup blocks
Date: 2005-06-01 02:20:32
Message-ID: 9156.1117592432@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Is this a change that would be backpatched as you suggested previously?

I don't think we can backpatch any of these items, since they involve
changes in the on-disk file format. I was thinking of them as CVS HEAD
changes only.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Satoshi Nagayasu 2005-06-01 02:29:14 Re: audit facilities?
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2005-06-01 02:15:44 Re: Deadlock with tsearch2 index ...