Re: [HACKERS] md.c is feeling much better now, thank you

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] md.c is feeling much better now, thank you
Date: 1999-09-02 14:43:33
Message-ID: 9155.936283413@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> I think that, based on this, the changes should be back'd out of v6.5.2
> until further testing and analysis can be done.

If we can't find a solution to the inval-too-late problem pronto,
what we can do is comment out the FileUnlink call in mdtruncate.
I don't see a need to back out the other fixes in md.c.

But I think we ought to fix the underlying problem, not this symptom.
What we now see is that after one backend has done something that
requires invalidating a relcache entry, another backend is able
to complete an entire query using the *old* relcache info before it
notices the shared-inval signal. That's got to have bad consequences
for more than just md.c.

regards, tom lane

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 1999-09-02 14:55:29 Re: [HACKERS] Odd problem with pg_class ...
Previous Message Leon 1999-09-02 14:38:43 Re: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer