| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Something is rotten in publication drop |
| Date: | 2017-06-20 20:36:43 |
| Message-ID: | 9151.1497991003@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>> Should we add that to the opr_sanity tests?
>> Yeah, I was wondering about that too. I can imagine that someday
>> there will be prosecdef built-in functions ... but probably, there
>> would never be so many that maintaining the expected-results list
>> would be hard.
> And if it is, then we remove the test.
Right. I'll go make it so.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2017-06-20 20:51:36 | Is exec_simple_check_node still doing anything? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-06-20 20:35:36 | Re: Typo in insert.sgml |