Re: NUMA settings

From: Marc Rechté <marc4(at)rechte(dot)fr>
To: pgsql-performance(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: NUMA settings
Date: 2020-05-05 08:11:20
Message-ID: 9149ca0b-3e36-9df2-1ea5-2ad3af7968de@rechte.fr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

> On Tue, 2020-05-05 at 07:56 +0200, Marc Rechté wrote:
>> Thanks for answers. Further readings make me think that we should *not*
>> start postgres with numactl --interleave=all: this may have counter
>> productive effect on backends anon memory (heap, stack). IMHO, what is
>> important is to use Huge Pages for shared buffers: they are allocated
>> (reserved) by the kernel at boot time and spread evenly on all nodes. On
>> top of that they never swap.
>>
>> My (temp) conclusions are following:
>> vm.zone_reclaim_mode = 0
>> kernel.numa_balancing = 0 (still not sure with that choice)
>> wm.swappiness = 60 (default)
>> start postgres as usual (no numactl)
>
> Thanks for sharing your insights.
>
> I think that "vm.swappiness" should be 0.
> PostgreSQL does its own memory management, any swapping by the kernel
> would go against that.
>
> Yours,
> Laurenz Albe
>
As said in the post, we wish the idle backends to be swapped out if
necessary. Therefore lowering swappiness would produce the opposite
effect: swapping out Linux file cache rather than backends memory.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Laurenz Albe 2020-05-05 08:25:57 Re: NUMA settings
Previous Message Laurenz Albe 2020-05-05 08:08:20 Re: Please help! Query jumps from 1s -> 4m