Re: oh dear ...

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: oh dear ...
Date: 2003-11-15 04:42:10
Message-ID: 9143.1068871330@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> Shouldn't you also add a regression test to catch this in the future?

Yes, I absolutely plan to stick some regression test additions into HEAD.
There's not a need for such changes in the 7.4 branch though. Right at
the moment what we need is a decision about whether to apply the code
change to 7.4 release ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2003-11-15 04:51:15 Re: oh dear ...
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-11-15 04:35:02 Re: oh dear ...