From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL 9.0b1 - Error when checking table sizes |
Date: | 2010-05-27 22:00:00 |
Message-ID: | 9142.1274997600@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> This probably isn't a legitimate bug, but as a precaution....
> I'm running the following command against PostgreSQL 9.0 beta 1:
> psql -U postgres -d test -c "select tablename,
> pg_size_pretty(pg_table_size(tablename::regclass)) from pg_tables
> order by tablename;"
> And getting the following message:
> ERROR: relation "sql_sizing" does not exist
The "tablename::regclass" bit is guaranteed to fail for any relation
that's not in your current search_path, because you're just handing
an unqualified name to the regclass converter.
If you're absolutely intent on using the pg_tables view here, you
could do this instead:
(quote_ident(schemaname) || '.' || quote_ident(tablename))::regclass
Frankly though this seems like quite the hard way. Why not just
select relname, pg_size_pretty(pg_table_size(oid)) from pg_class
where relkind = 'r'
order by relname;
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thom Brown | 2010-05-27 22:03:21 | Re: PostgreSQL 9.0b1 - Error when checking table sizes |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2010-05-27 21:53:12 | Re: PostgreSQL 9.0b1 - Error when checking table sizes |