From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: V3 protocol + DECLARE problems |
Date: | 2004-07-21 15:42:29 |
Message-ID: | 9141.1090424549@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com> writes:
> Logs follow; basically this is issuing a Parse/Bind/Execute for a
> parameterized DECLARE, which blows up with "no value found for parameter
> 1" despite there definitely being one there. (also, that error appears
> on Execute, not Parse/Bind).
This may be fixable --- I'm thinking that the problem has to do with not
passing down parameters from one portal to another in a situation where
they probably should be.
> Any chance of getting this fixed for 7.5?
I'm up to my keister in PITR and nested-xact issues and won't have time
to look at it soon. Do you want to take a look and see if you can find
where the ball is getting dropped?
> Alternatively, if we can get WITH HOLD / SCROLL behaviour in portals
> created by Execute (probably means a protocol change) that works too.
This won't be salable unless we decide we really need a protocol change
to support nested xacts properly. With the change to SAVEPOINT syntax
the motivation for that may have diminished --- in particular I doubt
that we can usefully report a nesting depth, so the urge to fool with
the Z message has diminished greatly (in my mind anyway).
I'd suggest looking into the parameter issue if you want to have
confidence in a fix being available in 7.5.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dennis Bjorklund | 2004-07-21 15:52:13 | text and varchar |
Previous Message | Gaetano Mendola | 2004-07-21 15:36:58 | Re: check point segments leakage ? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kris Jurka | 2004-07-21 20:12:33 | Re: patch: ensure testdbencoding test table is dropped |
Previous Message | malleshkarthik | 2004-07-21 07:08:04 | unsubscribe |