Re: HaveNFreeProcs ?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)surnet(dot)cl>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: HaveNFreeProcs ?
Date: 2005-06-23 04:44:25
Message-ID: 914.1119501865@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:
> ... because it's written to not loop more than
> superuser_reserved_connections times, and it's hard to imagine anyone
> would set that to more than half a dozen or so.

We could help keep people on the correct path if guc.c enforced a sane
upper limit on superuser_reserved_connections. I'm thinking somewhere
around 10.

Any thoughts about that?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gavin Sherry 2005-06-23 04:47:40 Re: [PATCHES] O_DIRECT for WAL writes
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-06-23 04:33:35 Re: [PATCHES] O_DIRECT for WAL writes