| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_proc.h |
| Date: | 2005-11-10 15:27:53 |
| Message-ID: | 9138.1131636473@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> contains the following:
> /* keep the following ordered by OID so that later changes can be made
> easier */
> which has manifestly not been followed. Should we fix the file or remove
> the second comment?
Reordering the file into strict OID order is certainly a loser, as it'd
remove whatever semblance of logical structure remains. However I think
the comment has some historical value. Perhaps reword it a bit.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-11-10 15:38:05 | Re: pg_proc.h |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2005-11-10 15:24:46 | Re: [HACKERS] win32 8.1 pgadmin dll issues |