From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Hiroshi Inoue" <inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | "'Bruce Momjian'" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "'Marc G(dot) Fournier'" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pgsql-server/src/backend catalog/index.c comma ... |
Date: | 2003-09-28 15:36:54 |
Message-ID: | 9135.1064763414@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
"Hiroshi Inoue" <inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> Though there has been no discussion like discussion on this
> item between Tom and me, his code is already there.
> Is it reasonbale ? As I already mentioned many many times
> putting back his change should have been the first thing but
> it wasn't.
You already reverted the first version. I followed full protocol
in the second version: I posted a design spec and then a proposed
patch, and I waited what seemed a reasonable length of time for
comments before committing. You do not have the right to expect
that commits will be held off indefinitely if you don't have the
time to respond to discussion.
I should also point out that according to the CVS logs, you have not
touched the reindex code in nearly two years. If you were actively
working on it, I'd surely not have joggled your elbow. But you can't
expect that there is a permanent KEEP OUT sign on code you once worked
on.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jan Wieck | 2003-09-28 17:46:20 | pgsql-server/src/bin/pg_dump Tag: REL7_3_STABL ... |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-09-28 15:04:40 | Re: pgsql-server/src/backend catalog/index.c comma ... |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-28 15:48:04 | Re: _GNU_SOURCE |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-09-28 15:07:58 | _GNU_SOURCE |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2003-09-28 18:15:53 | Re: Improving REINDEX for system indexes (long) |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-09-28 15:05:14 | Re: tsearch2 memory alloc checks |