From: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
---|---|
To: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Polyphase merge is obsolete |
Date: | 2021-07-14 15:04:14 |
Message-ID: | 91284957-3cb2-944e-5f14-5c2ff86b49fa@iki.fi |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 14/07/2021 15:12, vignesh C wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 3:49 AM Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> wrote:
>> Here's an updated version that fixes one bug:
>>
>> The CFBot was reporting a failure on the FreeBSD system [1]. It turned
>> out to be an out-of-memory issue caused by an underflow bug in the
>> calculation of the size of the tape read buffer size. With a small
>> work_mem size, the memory left for tape buffers was negative, and that
>> wrapped around to a very large number. I believe that was not caught by
>> the other systems, because the other ones had enough memory for the
>> incorrectly-sized buffers anyway. That was the case on my laptop at
>> least. It did cause a big slowdown in the 'tuplesort' regression test
>> though, which I hadn't noticed.
>>
>> The fix for that bug is here as a separate patch for easier review, but
>> I'll squash it before committing.
>
> The patch does not apply on Head anymore, could you rebase and post a
> patch. I'm changing the status to "Waiting for Author".
Here's a rebased version. I also squashed that little bug fix from
previous patch set.
- Heikki
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
0001-Refactor-LogicalTapeSet-LogicalTape-interface.patch | text/x-patch | 67.8 KB |
0002-Replace-polyphase-merge-algorithm-with-a-simple-bala.patch | text/x-patch | 40.8 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2021-07-14 15:08:34 | Re: row filtering for logical replication |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2021-07-14 15:02:47 | Re: Incorrect usage of strtol, atoi for non-numeric junk inputs |