Re: TABLE command

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: TABLE command
Date: 2008-10-30 12:20:58
Message-ID: 9124.1225369258@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> If I read this right, SQL would allow writing
> TABLE foo;

> as a top-level command, equivalent to SELECT * FROM foo; (see production
> <explicit table>). It can be used whereever a SELECT or VALUES can be used.

> This is probably about as useless as some of my other recent patches,
> but the implementation is simple (see attachment), so we could add it.
> Comments?

Considering how ugly it was to fit top-level VALUES into our
documentation, I'm not really looking forward to this one. I'd vote no,
at least until such time as we see some field demand for it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-10-30 12:30:28 Re: Hot Standby: Caches and Locks
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-10-30 12:16:41 Re: pre-MED