From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Nisha Moond <nisha(dot)moond412(at)gmail(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Large expressions in indexes can't be stored (non-TOASTable) |
Date: | 2025-04-28 22:19:19 |
Message-ID: | 910625.1745878759@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 05:35:08PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Possibly better idea: can we add something like
>> Assert(!OidIsValid(reltoastrelid)) in the code that is making this
>> assumption?
> Yeah, we could add something like that to replorigin_create() pretty
> easily. The comment for that would be even harder to miss.
Maybe one more sentence in the code comment so that the logic is
easier to follow:
+ /*
+ * We want to be able to access pg_replication_origin without setting up a
+ * snapshot. To make that safe, it needs to not have a TOAST table,
+ * since TOASTed data cannot be fetched without a snapshot. As of this
+ * writing, ...
LGTM other than that nit.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Smith | 2025-04-28 23:07:32 | Re: DOCS - create publication (tweak for generated columns) |
Previous Message | Nathan Bossart | 2025-04-28 22:17:00 | Re: Disallow redundant indexes |