Re: JSON Path and GIN Questions

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: JSON Path and GIN Questions
Date: 2023-12-17 23:30:10
Message-ID: 9103BD24-4EBF-4652-81CA-051822BF995B@justatheory.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Dec 17, 2023, at 16:08, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> I'd waited because the discussion was still active, and then it
> kind of slipped off the radar. I'll take another look and push
> some form of what I suggested.

Right on.

> That doesn't really address the
> jsonpath oddities you were on about, though.

No, I attempted to address those in [a patch][1].

[1]: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/45/4624/

Best,

David

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2023-12-17 23:31:26 Re: planner chooses incremental but not the best one
Previous Message Andy Fan 2023-12-17 23:22:31 Re: Is a clearer memory lifespan for outerTuple and innerTuple useful?