Re: C++ port of Postgres

From: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com>
To: Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz>, dandl <david(at)andl(dot)org>, 'Adam Brusselback' <adambrusselback(at)gmail(dot)com>, 'Joy Arulraj' <jarulraj(at)cs(dot)cmu(dot)edu>
Cc: 'kang joni' <kangjoni76(at)gmail(dot)com>, 'Dmitry Igrishin' <dmitigr(at)gmail(dot)com>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: C++ port of Postgres
Date: 2016-08-16 20:04:37
Message-ID: 90e98f78-b091-c2cd-a1ba-e6c0c2471e51@BlueTreble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On 8/16/16 2:52 AM, Gavin Flower wrote:
> In both cases, part of the motivation to change from C was to appeal to
> new developers - from what I remember of the discussions.

I have moved this discussion over to -hackers.
(https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/f7682c24-4271-1ff5-d963-053ecb0fce40@BlueTreble.com)
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532) mobile: 512-569-9461

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Nasby 2016-08-16 20:15:00 Re: Any reasons for 'DO' statement not returning result?
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2016-08-16 19:59:43 Re: Any reasons for 'DO' statement not returning result?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2016-08-16 20:04:59 Re: parallel.c is not marked as test covered
Previous Message Dmitry Igrishin 2016-08-16 19:42:34 Re: [GENERAL] C++ port of Postgres