Re: (PATCH) Adding CORRESPONDING to Set Operations

From: "Erik Rijkers" <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
To: "Kerem Kat" <keremkat(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: (PATCH) Adding CORRESPONDING to Set Operations
Date: 2011-10-25 18:09:51
Message-ID: 90d32620940905c1c2ef608fa653941d.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, October 25, 2011 19:49, Kerem Kat wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 20:52, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl> wrote:
>> On Wed, October 19, 2011 15:01, Kerem Kat wrote:
>>> Adding CORRESPONDING to Set Operations
> I have corrected the ordering of the targetlists of subqueries. And
> added 12 regression
> tests for column list ordering. Can you confirm that the order has
> changed for you?
>

Yes, this one is OK.

thanks,

Erik Rijkers

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sushant Sinha 2011-10-25 18:15:17 Re: lexemes in prefix search going through dictionary modifications
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2011-10-25 18:05:42 Re: patch for distinguishing PG instances in event log v2