From: | "Trevor Talbot" <quension(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "sulfinu(at)gmail(dot)com" <sulfinu(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: String encoding during connection "handshake" |
Date: | 2007-11-28 18:49:34 |
Message-ID: | 90bce5730711281049j7579df55s19cba8b79481afb8@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 11/28/07, sulfinu(at)gmail(dot)com <sulfinu(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wednesday 28 November 2007, Trevor Talbot wrote:
> > I'm not entirely sure how that's supposed to solve the client
> > authentication issue though. Demanding that clients present auth data
> > in UTF-8 is no different than demanding they present it in the
> > encoding it was entered in originally...
> Oh no, it's a big difference: PREDICTABILITY!
> Why must I guess the encoding used by the administrator? What if he's Chinese?
> Instead, I know the cluster's encoding, just as I know the server name and
> the TCP port. And the connection handshake carries on without
> misunderstandings (read wrong encoding).
What if the user and client program is Chinese too? Not everything is
developed in an environment where UTF-8 support is easily available.
Either way, it is a demand on the client, and not necessarily a simple
one.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-11-28 18:50:02 | Re: [HACKERS] Time to update list of contributors |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-11-28 18:39:55 | Re: [HACKERS] Time to update list of contributors |