Re: Locking entire database

From: "Trevor Talbot" <quension(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Panagiwths Pediadiths" <pped(at)ics(dot)forth(dot)gr>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Locking entire database
Date: 2007-09-16 11:45:02
Message-ID: 90bce5730709160445t246ec76bv9727f67ad88b59f3@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 9/15/07, Panagiwths Pediadiths <pped(at)ics(dot)forth(dot)gr> wrote:

> Shouldn't the serializable level prevent these duplicates? As I understand
> it serializable
> should give the same result as if the transactions were performed the one
> after the other.

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/static/transaction-iso.html#MVCC-SERIALIZABILITY

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2007-09-16 12:03:22 Re: Locking entire database
Previous Message Panagiwths Pediadiths 2007-09-16 10:46:44 Re: Locking entire database