From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
Subject: | Re: Online enabling of checksums |
Date: | 2018-02-22 13:22:48 |
Message-ID: | 90aa5853-e3ef-388e-a64b-e9981d3a195f@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2/21/18 15:53, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> *Two new functions are added, pg_enable_data_checksums() and
> pg_disable_data_checksums(). The disable one is easy -- it just changes
> to disable. The enable one will change the state to inprogress, and then
> start a background worker (the “checksumhelper launcher”). This worker
> in turn will start one sub-worker (“checksumhelper worker”) in each
> database (currently all done sequentially).*
This is at least the fourth version of the pattern launcher plus worker
background workers. I wonder whether we can do something to make this
easier and less repetitive. Not in this patch, of course.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2018-02-22 13:25:45 | phasing out pg_pltemplate? |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2018-02-22 13:20:51 | Re: Drop --disable-floatN-byval configure options? |