From: | Jan Karremans <jan(dot)karremans(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Chris Travers <chris(dot)travers(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Darren Duncan <darren(at)darrenduncan(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Has anyone seen this marketing gimmick? EnterpriseDB vs MySQL vs MariaDB |
Date: | 2017-09-12 13:53:59 |
Message-ID: | 90B8CE2A-8C62-49F8-BC02-64484DC2AE39@enterprisedb.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Could it just be that they are scared of PostgreSQL and now single out EDB as a target for a specific market?
> On 12 sep. 2017, at 15:51, Chris Travers <chris(dot)travers(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 3:42 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net <mailto:sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>> wrote:
> Simon,
>
> * Simon Riggs (simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com <mailto:simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>) wrote:
> > On 12 September 2017 at 13:11, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net <mailto:sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>> wrote:
> >
> > > If they really wanted to contrast 'open source commitment' between the
> > > various vendors, they probably should have considered including the
> > > company that actually commits the most code to PG too, but that's
> > > starting to show my own bias.
> >
> > It certainly would be very generous of you to mention 2ndQuadrant, thank you.
>
> I had been avoiding mentioning any specific compnay names; the point
> being that there clearly was little research done by the folks that put
> together this upcoming talk into who is doing what in the Postgres
> space.
>
> I agree that it would have been good for them to include all of the
> major players when it comes to PG and not just focus on one. The
> unfortunate reality is that in many other projects there's "the one" big
> company behind the open source project and few realize that PG has such
> a great and diverse multi-company ecosystem, even though many of us make
> a point to bring it up whenever we get the chance.
>
> I agree with these points. Of course a competitive overview by a competitor might be taking a different approach for one or a number of other reasons. For example if price is one thing they are covering, things would be different if they are covering the official version of the software.
>
> What might be interesting to discuss here is what more we can be doing
> to make it clear that the PostgreSQL project is independent of any
> single company and instead has contributions from many, not unlike the
> Linux Foundation or the Python Foundation.
>
> 100% agreed on that point.
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> Stephen
>
>
>
> --
> Best Wishes,
> Chris Travers
>
> Efficito: Hosted Accounting and ERP. Robust and Flexible. No vendor lock-in.
> http://www.efficito.com/learn_more <http://www.efficito.com/learn_more>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Bernier | 2017-09-12 14:13:21 | Re: Has anyone seen this marketing gimmick? EnterpriseDB vs MySQL vs MariaDB |
Previous Message | Chris Travers | 2017-09-12 13:51:56 | Re: Has anyone seen this marketing gimmick? EnterpriseDB vs MySQL vs MariaDB |