| From: | Andreas Kretschmer <andreas(at)a-kretschmer(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Replication question |
| Date: | 2018-10-22 14:04:34 |
| Message-ID: | 909dbbe4-57d6-e881-9dc2-9fa1be63641a@a-kretschmer.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Am 22.10.2018 um 15:53 schrieb Scot Kreienkamp:
> I thought I read somewhere that in 9.6, as long as the WAL log is
> available on disk or in the archive the replication server will
> provide that to the replication client, and my archive NFS mount
> didn’t have to be available to all replication clients. It doesn’t
> seem to be operating that way though. Did I completely remember that
> wrong or did I misunderstand something?
no, but you can define a "restore_command" within your recovery_conf.
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/continuous-archiving.html
Regards, Andreas
--
2ndQuadrant - The PostgreSQL Support Company.
www.2ndQuadrant.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Scottix | 2018-10-22 15:22:34 | Re: Optimizing Postgresql ILIKE while query |
| Previous Message | Scot Kreienkamp | 2018-10-22 14:04:19 | RE: Replication question |