From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Removing xloginsert_slots? |
Date: | 2014-01-29 20:53:43 |
Message-ID: | 90958b60-9439-40d9-a4bb-934645ef6082@email.android.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 29. Januar 2014 20:51:38 MEZ, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 8:22 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
>wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 2014-01-29 21:59:05 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>> The undocumented GUC called xloginsert_slots has been introduced by
>>> commit 9a20a9b. It is mentioned by the commit that this parameter
>>> should be removed before the release. Wouldn't it be a good time to
>>> remove this parameter soon? I imagine that removing it before the
>beta
>>> would make sense so now is perhaps too early... Either way, attached
>>> is a patch doing so...
>>
>> I'd rather wait till somebody actually has done some benchmarks. I
>don't
>> think we're more clueful about it now than back when the patch went
>> in. And such benchmarking is more likely during beta, so...
>
>Well, it's either got to go away, or get documented, IMHO.
Yes, all I am saying is that I'd like to wait till things have calmed down a bit, so it actually makes sense to run bigger benchmarks. I don't think removing the option is that urgent.
Andres
--
Please excuse brevity and formatting - I am writing this on my mobile phone.
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2014-01-29 21:10:00 | pgsql: Include planning time in EXPLAIN ANALYZE output. |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2014-01-29 20:50:57 | Re: jsonb and nested hstore |