Re: Creating a 'SET' type

"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> However, is it possible to create a type that has different parameters
> wherever it is used.
> For instance - the varchar type takes as a parameter the max characters in
> the field. Although there is only one varchar type, it has different
> properties depending on whether or not it is varchar(5) or varchar(20).

Right now, that support is hard-wired into the parser for each such type
(and there aren't many). It might be interesting to look at what it
would take to make a generalized mechanism whereby a type name could
accept parameters, with a type-specific routine being responsible for
reducing the parameters down to a typmod value. One problem you'd run
into, I think, is creation of parsing ambiguities --- is NUMERIC(9,2)
a type specification, or a function call? Right now it's a type spec
because NUMERIC is a keyword in the grammar, but that won't do for an
extensible mechanism.

regards, tom lane