| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>,Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Chris Travers <chris(dot)travers(at)adjust(dot)com>,pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal for Signal Detection Refactoring |
| Date: | 2018-10-09 15:19:00 |
| Message-ID: | 907A1E93-BA21-40CE-B86E-BF4D84242567@anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On October 9, 2018 6:58:18 AM PDT, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>On 25/09/2018 02:23, Andres Freund wrote:
>>> My point was just to reduce the number of variables used and ease
>>> debugger lookups with what is on the stack.
>> I'm not sure a bitflag really gives you that - before gdb gives you
>the
>> plain value, afterwards you need to know the enum values and do bit
>math
>> to know.
>
>You could use an actual C bit field, to make debugging easier.
See Tom's reply to this suggestion...
Andres
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2018-10-09 16:12:31 | Re: Index Skip Scan |
| Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2018-10-09 15:16:14 | Re: executor relation handling |