Re: Archive directory

From: Scott Ribe <scott_ribe(at)elevated-dev(dot)com>
To: Paul Förster <paul(dot)foerster(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Yambu <hyambu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Archive directory
Date: 2020-12-07 14:11:38
Message-ID: 9076CFB7-5E9B-4458-AD4F-BC94AE3B6A0F@elevated-dev.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

> On Dec 7, 2020, at 7:02 AM, Paul Förster <paul(dot)foerster(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> in my understanding, this is only true if you don't use replication slots. If you use replication slots then the primary should know when a WAL file is no longer needed and abandoned or ready to be recycled.

I don't think OP is talking about the WAL files PG is managing; I think he's talking about WAL files copied into an archive directory.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Paul Förster 2020-12-07 14:31:21 Re: Archive directory
Previous Message MichaelDBA 2020-12-07 14:08:15 Re: Archive directory