Re: pg_dump seg fault on sequences

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Michael Nolan" <htfoot(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql general" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dump seg fault on sequences
Date: 2007-04-16 18:33:02
Message-ID: 9070.1176748382@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

I wrote:
> The definitional question is: if we selected only the sequence to dump,
> do we want that ALTER command to appear in the output or not? It's a
> reasonably straightforward fix either way (a bit easier for "not"),
> but I'm unsure which is the most useful behavior.

There doesn't seem to be any strong opinion out there one way or the
other, so I'll fix it the easier way: the ALTER OWNED BY will only
appear if both the table and the sequence are selected to be dumped.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message jdh3rd 2007-04-16 18:38:23 Procurando Freelancer PostgreSQL -- Rio de Janeiro
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-04-16 18:28:57 Re: PITR - "Rewind to snapshot" scheme