Re: Sorting performance vs. MySQL

From: Yang Zhang <yanghatespam(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Sorting performance vs. MySQL
Date: 2010-02-22 19:30:43
Message-ID: 9066fa251002221130m6b4b97bby1cc6bbfd00af6353@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> Yang Zhang escribió:
>> I have the exact same table of data in both MySQL and Postgresql. In Postgresql:
>
> I just noticed two things:
>
> [snip lots of stuff]
>
> 1.
>
>> ) ENGINE=MyISAM AUTO_INCREMENT=50410166 DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1
>
> You're doing a comparison to MyISAM.

We've actually been using innodb as well; it exhibits similar
execution times to MyISAM.

>
>
> 2.
>
>>   select * from metarelcloud_transactionlog order by transactionid;
>
> You're reading the whole table.
>
> This is unlikely to fly very far.  I suggest you try some query that's
> actually going to be used in the real world.

This isn't some microbenchmark. This is part of our actual analytical
application. We're running large-scale graph partitioning algorithms.
--
Yang Zhang
http://www.mit.edu/~y_z/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2010-02-22 19:39:39 Re: Sorting performance vs. MySQL
Previous Message Yang Zhang 2010-02-22 19:28:33 Re: Sorting performance vs. MySQL