From: | Yang Zhang <yanghatespam(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Sorting performance vs. MySQL |
Date: | 2010-02-22 19:30:43 |
Message-ID: | 9066fa251002221130m6b4b97bby1cc6bbfd00af6353@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> Yang Zhang escribió:
>> I have the exact same table of data in both MySQL and Postgresql. In Postgresql:
>
> I just noticed two things:
>
> [snip lots of stuff]
>
> 1.
>
>> ) ENGINE=MyISAM AUTO_INCREMENT=50410166 DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1
>
> You're doing a comparison to MyISAM.
We've actually been using innodb as well; it exhibits similar
execution times to MyISAM.
>
>
> 2.
>
>> select * from metarelcloud_transactionlog order by transactionid;
>
> You're reading the whole table.
>
> This is unlikely to fly very far. I suggest you try some query that's
> actually going to be used in the real world.
This isn't some microbenchmark. This is part of our actual analytical
application. We're running large-scale graph partitioning algorithms.
--
Yang Zhang
http://www.mit.edu/~y_z/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2010-02-22 19:39:39 | Re: Sorting performance vs. MySQL |
Previous Message | Yang Zhang | 2010-02-22 19:28:33 | Re: Sorting performance vs. MySQL |