| From: | Yang Zhang <yanghatespam(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Sorting performance vs. MySQL |
| Date: | 2010-02-22 19:08:24 |
| Message-ID: | 9066fa251002221108q608c42a8j2c7b4b587ec1127@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> Yang Zhang escribió:
>
>> I'm running:
>>
>> select * from metarelcloud_transactionlog order by transactionid;
>>
>> It takes MySQL 6 minutes, but Postgresql is still running after 70
>> minutes. Is there something like a glaring misconfiguration that I'm
>> overlooking? Thanks in advance.
>
> How large is the table, and have you vacuumed it? Did you analyze it?
> What Pg version is this?
The table has 50.4M tuples. It's been vacuumed and analyzed. I'm using
PG 8.3.8 on Fedora 10 x86_64.
--
Yang Zhang
http://www.mit.edu/~y_z/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Frank Heikens | 2010-02-22 19:15:04 | Re: Sorting performance vs. MySQL |
| Previous Message | Yang Zhang | 2010-02-22 19:07:21 | Re: Sorting performance vs. MySQL |