| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, teramoto(dot)junji(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Resurrecting per-page cleaner for btree |
| Date: | 2006-08-10 02:05:53 |
| Message-ID: | 9062.1155175553@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Have we made a decision on this issue? Should I apply my patch that
> still forces a split unless 10% of the page has been freed?
I haven't gotten back to doing any more performance testing. Please
stick that patch on the pending queue, so we don't forget it, but
don't apply it yet ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-10 02:06:23 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: /contrib/cube improvements: Update |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-08-10 02:00:02 | Re: [HACKERS] Resurrecting per-page cleaner for btree |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-10 02:06:23 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: /contrib/cube improvements: Update |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-08-10 02:00:02 | Re: [HACKERS] Resurrecting per-page cleaner for btree |