| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Inder <robert(at)interactive(dot)co(dot)uk>, Pg Docs <pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL 12: Cryptic documentation |
| Date: | 2020-08-15 16:38:47 |
| Message-ID: | 904676.1597509527@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
"David G. Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> As with most things there is always room for improvement. In this case,
> though, I'm not seeing anything wrong with the direct wording provided.
Also, it's under a heading that says "The following command-line options
control the location and format of the output", which ought to make it
clear that it's not about the source server's WAL dir. (Although I notice
that whoever added the --max-rate parameter didn't read that heading :-()
Still, I see that the main -D parameter is described as "Directory to
write the output to", which seems like a clearer phrasing, so I'm inclined
to similarly reword the description of --waldir.
A more direct criticism of the --waldir description is that it's not
stated what happens if you don't provide that argument.
I notice some shaky grammar and other minor annoyances in this page,
so I'm kind of inclined to make an editorial pass over the whole thing.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2020-08-16 21:26:40 | Inaccurate description of UNION/CASE/etc type selection |
| Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2020-08-15 16:21:54 | Re: PostgreSQL 12: Cryptic documentation |