Re: Pg_dumpall

From: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: sfmconsult(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Pg_dumpall
Date: 2018-04-08 17:01:39
Message-ID: 903C7F7F-C143-47A2-8CF3-0EC48E2390B2@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

Hi,

> On Apr 7, 2018, at 10:55 AM, PG Doc comments form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/backup-dump.html
> Description:
>
> "The basic usage of this command is:
>
> pg_dumpall > outfile
> The resulting dump can be restored with psql:
>
> psql -f infile postgres
> (Actually, you can specify any existing database name to..."
>
> Should this not read :
> psql-f outfile postgres

Technically it is correct: you’re dumping data to an output file,
and reading the data in from an input file. The documentation
also makes reference to what the “outfile” and “infile” represent.

That being said, I can see how it can be confusing particularly
if you are reading through the documentation quickly. Perhaps
a name like “dumpfile” would be more clear?

Jonathan

In response to

  • Pg_dumpall at 2018-04-07 14:55:52 from PG Doc comments form

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-04-08 20:21:54 Re: Pg_dumpall
Previous Message PG Doc comments form 2018-04-07 14:55:52 Pg_dumpall