From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Rich Shepard <rshepard(at)appl-ecosys(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Possible bug in postgresql-7.1.3-1PGDG |
Date: | 2001-10-19 01:26:38 |
Message-ID: | 9028.1003454798@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Rich Shepard <rshepard(at)appl-ecosys(dot)com> writes:
> [postgres(at)salmo rshepard]$ postgres -D /var/lib/pgsql/data/
> FATAL 2: open("/var/lib/pgsql/data//global/pg_control") failed: No such
> file or directory
> I don't understand the double forward slash, however, pg_control _is_ in
> /var/lib/pgsql/data.
Well, I can explain that: it's because you have an unnecessary ending
slash in your -D parameter. The code just concatenates "/global/pg_control"
to whatever you typed.
However, I doubt that saying
postgres -D /var/lib/pgsql/data
will help --- every Unix I've ever dealt with treats two consecutive
slashes the same as one, just because it makes it a lot easier to be
sloppy about building pathnames ...
> I did see a reference -- somewhere -- saying that this was a known upgrade
> bug and the web sites had a solution.
Doesn't ring a bell with me offhand. Can you find that reference again?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-10-19 01:34:31 | Re: VACUUM vs VACUUM ANALYZE |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-10-19 01:26:17 | Re: To Postgres Devs : Wouldn't changing the select limit |