From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
Cc: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, depesz(at)depesz(dot)com, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Can we get rid of repeated queries from pg_dump? |
Date: | 2021-08-27 22:25:05 |
Message-ID: | 900377.1630103105@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> * Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
>> I experimented with the attached, very quick-n-dirty patch to collect
>> format_type results during the initial scan of pg_type, instead. On the
>> regression database in HEAD, it reduces the number of queries pg_dump
>> issues from 3260 to 2905; but I'm having a hard time detecting any net
>> performance change.
> Seems like the issue here is mainly just the latency of each query being
> rather high compared to most use-cases, so local testing where there's
> basically zero latency wouldn't see any change in timing, but throw a
> trans-atlantic or worse amount of latency between the system running
> pg_dump and the PG server and you'd see notable wall-clock savings in
> time.
Yeah. What I was more concerned about was the potential downside
of running format_type() for each pg_type row, even though we might
use only a few of those results. The fact that I'm *not* seeing
a performance hit with a local server is encouraging from that
standpoint.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2021-08-27 22:27:20 | Re: Can we get rid of repeated queries from pg_dump? |
Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2021-08-27 22:10:19 | Re: use fopen unknown resource |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2021-08-27 22:27:20 | Re: Can we get rid of repeated queries from pg_dump? |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2021-08-27 21:58:36 | Re: Can we get rid of repeated queries from pg_dump? |