From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru> |
Cc: | Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Davin Shearer <davin(at)apache(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Emitting JSON to file using COPY TO |
Date: | 2024-03-08 18:01:50 |
Message-ID: | 8ef5f5d6-38db-4624-8eef-2d96c9eba9d4@joeconway.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On 3/8/24 12:28, Andrey M. Borodin wrote:
> Hello everyone!
>
> Thanks for working on this, really nice feature!
>
>> On 9 Jan 2024, at 01:40, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks -- will have a look
>
> Joe, recently folks proposed a lot of patches in this thread that seem like diverted from original way of implementation.
> As an author of CF entry [0] can you please comment on which patch version needs review?
I don't know if I agree with the proposed changes, but I have also been
waiting to see how the parallel discussion regarding COPY extensibility
shakes out.
And there were a couple of issues found that need to be tracked down.
Additionally I have had time/availability challenges recently.
Overall, chances seem slim that this will make it into 17, but I have
not quite given up hope yet either.
--
Joe Conway
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Gauthier | 2024-03-08 18:24:52 | Re: v11.5- v15.3 upgrade (linux) |
Previous Message | Jay Madren | 2024-03-08 17:48:01 | Re: Windows service randomly stops with no indication why |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Melanie Plageman | 2024-03-08 18:21:36 | Re: Confine vacuum skip logic to lazy_scan_skip |
Previous Message | Andrey M. Borodin | 2024-03-08 17:59:51 | Re: CF entries for 17 to be reviewed |