Re: Query on User account password change details

From: Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Query on User account password change details
Date: 2021-05-07 14:14:21
Message-ID: 8ed70776-3c35-d688-4820-4c73cbdb767a@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

On 5/7/21 9:10 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 08:55:15AM -0500, Ron wrote:
>> On 5/7/21 7:30 AM, Scott Ribe wrote:
>>>> On May 6, 2021, at 11:40 PM, Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Comments like this are indicative of someone who's never been through an external audit.
>>> While maybe true, the point stands that even the original source of the requirement has admitted it's a bad idea, and standards bodies are dropping it. So, unlike many other things we might consider pointless, with this one, you have the kind of defense that might work in an audit.
>> The problem is that Postgresql allows Really Short Passwords without
>> uttering a peep, and that's not defensible to an auditor.
>>
>> psql (12.5 (Ubuntu 12.5-1.pgdg18.04+1))
>> Type "help" for help.
>>
>> postgres=# create role foo password 'a';
>> CREATE ROLE
>> postgres=#
> Have you considered passwordcheck?
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/passwordcheck.html

This might satisfy my own audit requirements!

--
Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2021-05-07 14:41:05 Re: Query on User account password change details
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2021-05-07 14:10:05 Re: Query on User account password change details