From: | Whit Armstrong <armstrong(dot)whit(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: how to cancel a query in progress |
Date: | 2009-06-17 18:16:33 |
Message-ID: | 8ec76080906171116s56532b36ybd196c2ee0da3c92@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Thanks. That's a relief.
getting a few "page xxx is uninitialized --- fixing" warnings in the
vacuum output, but seems like this should be expected since I killed
an insert in progress.
can anyone confirm that these warnings are ok?
WARNING: relation "balances_primary" page 1883404 is uninitialized --- fixing
WARNING: relation "balances_primary" page 1883405 is uninitialized --- fixing
WARNING: relation "balances_primary" page 1883406 is uninitialized --- fixing
-Whit
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Tom Lane<tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Whit Armstrong <armstrong(dot)whit(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Are there any integrity checks I need to run on the db after this type
>> of crash and recovery, or is vacuum --all good enough?
>
> There isn't anything you need to do. Postgres crashes don't corrupt
> on-disk data, as a general rule, and a SIGKILL crash seems particularly
> safe from that.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Konstantin Izmailov | 2009-06-17 18:38:16 | issue with lo_lseek - it returns 4 |
Previous Message | Aaron | 2009-06-17 17:16:24 | Re: GiST or GIN, I feel like I am doing something wrong |