From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Virtual generated columns |
Date: | 2025-01-08 16:19:21 |
Message-ID: | 8e85378a-934d-41fb-b92c-737f3023d3bc@eisentraut.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 11.12.24 07:49, jian he wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 6:01 PM Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> wrote:
>> The purpose of check_modified_virtual_generated() for trigger functions
>> written in C. The prevent someone from inserting real values into the
>> trigger tuples, because they would then be processed by the rest of the
>> system, which would be incorrect.
>>
>> Higher-level languages such as plpgsql should handle that themselves, by
>> preventing setting generated columns in trigger functions. The presence
>> of check_modified_virtual_generated() is still a backstop for those, but
>> shouldn't really be necessary.
>
> please check the attached patch.
> * remove check_modified_virtual_generated.
> * using heap_modify_tuple_by_cols in ExecBRInsertTriggers, ExecBRUpdateTriggers
> to overwrite virtual generated columns value to null.
>
> and it's not complicated.
> so that trigger behavior for stored and virtual will be more aligned
I have integrated that into v11. I agree it's not complicated and it's
better to keep the behavior aligned.
I kept the function check_modified_virtual_generated() but now it just
modifies the tuple, using your code, instead of erroring. That avoids
having to write the same code twice.
I don't understand the purpose of the change in pl_exec.c.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2025-01-08 16:23:46 | Re: Virtual generated columns |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2025-01-08 16:17:13 | Re: Virtual generated columns |