Re: Virtual generated columns

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
To: jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Virtual generated columns
Date: 2025-01-08 16:19:21
Message-ID: 8e85378a-934d-41fb-b92c-737f3023d3bc@eisentraut.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11.12.24 07:49, jian he wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 6:01 PM Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> wrote:
>> The purpose of check_modified_virtual_generated() for trigger functions
>> written in C. The prevent someone from inserting real values into the
>> trigger tuples, because they would then be processed by the rest of the
>> system, which would be incorrect.
>>
>> Higher-level languages such as plpgsql should handle that themselves, by
>> preventing setting generated columns in trigger functions. The presence
>> of check_modified_virtual_generated() is still a backstop for those, but
>> shouldn't really be necessary.
>
> please check the attached patch.
> * remove check_modified_virtual_generated.
> * using heap_modify_tuple_by_cols in ExecBRInsertTriggers, ExecBRUpdateTriggers
> to overwrite virtual generated columns value to null.
>
> and it's not complicated.
> so that trigger behavior for stored and virtual will be more aligned

I have integrated that into v11. I agree it's not complicated and it's
better to keep the behavior aligned.

I kept the function check_modified_virtual_generated() but now it just
modifies the tuple, using your code, instead of erroring. That avoids
having to write the same code twice.

I don't understand the purpose of the change in pl_exec.c.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2025-01-08 16:23:46 Re: Virtual generated columns
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2025-01-08 16:17:13 Re: Virtual generated columns