From: | "Loic d'Anterroches" <diaeresis(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pg_dump with 1100 schemas being a bit slow |
Date: | 2009-10-07 16:20:59 |
Message-ID: | 8e2f2cb20910070920l1b63cfdek7391a9480dda73e3@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Bill Moran <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com> wrote:
> In response to "Loic d'Anterroches" <diaeresis(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 4:23 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> > "Loic d'Anterroches" <diaeresis(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> >> Each night I am running:
>> >> pg_dump --blobs --schema=%s --no-acl -U postgres indefero | gzip >
>> >> /path/to/backups/%s/%s-%s.sql.gz
>> >> this for each installation, so 1100 times. Substitution strings are to
>> >> timestamp and get the right schema.
>
> Have you tested the speed without the gzip?
This is the first thing I did but in that case I was not able to get
any significant improvement. The data to gzip is very small "per
schema" so this is not the bottleneck.
> We found that compressing the dump takes considerably longer than pg_dump
> does, but pg_dump can't release its locks until gzip has completely
> processed all of the data, because of the pipe.
Good tip, I keep that in mind for the future!
Thanks,
loïc
--
Loïc d'Anterroches - Céondo Ltd - http://www.ceondo.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Loic d'Anterroches | 2009-10-07 16:25:00 | Re: pg_dump with 1100 schemas being a bit slow |
Previous Message | Massa, Harald Armin | 2009-10-07 16:00:50 | Re: pg_dump with 1100 schemas being a bit slow |