From: | Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)googlemail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
Cc: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: WIP: Deferrable unique constraints |
Date: | 2009-07-21 21:01:26 |
Message-ID: | 8e2dbb700907211401i76ec5e4tf351b0dd5b75e95b@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2009/7/21 Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>:
> On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 17:24 +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote:
>> The same argument could be applied to ruleutils.c, trigfuncs.c and perhaps
>> one or two others.
>>
>> And if not there, where then?
>
> I'm moving the patch status back to "waiting on author" until Alvaro's
> concerns are addressed. I don't have an opinion about what should happen
> to the location of the file, but some kind of decision should be made.
>
> Regards,
> Jeff Davis
>
>
OK, I'll try to post an updated patch soon.
I'm not seeing an obvious alternative location to utils/adt. Any advice would
be appreciated.
- Dean
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2009-07-21 21:05:57 | Re: WIP: Deferrable unique constraints |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2009-07-21 20:49:45 | Re: bytea vs. pg_dump |