Re: nchar is undocumented

From: Erik Wienhold <ewie(at)ewie(dot)name>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: nchar is undocumented
Date: 2024-05-06 13:42:56
Message-ID: 8ddac732-d650-4958-b9c9-ea8e6116251e@ewie.name
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On 2024-05-06 10:59 +0200, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> By the way, this neighboring sentence is a bit awkward
>
> " It must be ... or a type for which there is a cast from json to that type."
>
> Would it be better to say
> " It must be ... or a type to which a cast from json exists."
> ?

Yeah, that sounds better, but I'd say:
"[...] or a type _for_ which a cast from json exists."

Or maybe just
"[...] or any type that can be cast to json."
?

--
Erik

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Laurenz Albe 2024-05-06 14:15:24 Re: Connection Info
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2024-05-06 09:34:18 Re: nchar is undocumented