From: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | maxim(dot)boguk(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #17552: pg_stat_statements tracks internal FK check queries when COPY used to load data |
Date: | 2023-07-16 15:19:49 |
Message-ID: | 8dd1ef3e-378c-83dc-229b-e3d3e251ac11@enterprisedb.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On 3/22/23 13:21, Sergei Kornilov wrote:
> Hello
>
> I have a similar problem with exactly the same reason. Queries are counted as top level, although they are not called at the top level. Another small example:
>
> set pg_stat_statements.track_utility to off;
> set pg_stat_statements.track to 'top';
> do $$ declare i int; begin select 1 as n into i; end $$ language plpgsql;
> select toplevel, query from pg_stat_statements order by query;
> toplevel | query
> ----------+-----------------------------------
> t | select $1 as n
> t | select pg_stat_statements_reset()
> (2 rows)
>
> But "select $1 as n" was not a top-level query.
>
> In the first patch, a testcase showing the behavior now. The second patch adds a nesting level increment if track_utility is disabled. I need to duplicate the PGSS_HANDLED_UTILITY check here because it's documented above:
>
>> If it's an EXECUTE statement, we don't track it and don't increment the nesting level.
>
I took a look, and the patch seems correct to me. It'll need better
comments explaining the change, but I'll take care of that. Barring
objections, I'll get this committed and backpatched.
FWIW it's probably a good idea to post patches on pgsql-hackers - not
everyone watches pgsql-bugs and/or CF app. Furthermore, when a patch is
switched to "RFC" it's customary to mention that in the thread, along
with a review. Otherwise these silent changes are quite puzzling.
regards
--
Tomas Vondra
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alexander Lakhin | 2023-07-16 20:00:01 | Re: BUG #18014: Releasing catcache entries makes schema_to_xmlschema() fail when parallel workers are used |
Previous Message | Трофимов Иван | 2023-07-16 11:57:20 | Re: BUG #17948: libpq seems to misbehave in a pipelining corner case |