From: | Jürgen Purtz <juergen(at)purtz(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Add section headings to index types doc |
Date: | 2020-10-23 10:18:50 |
Message-ID: | 8d0b636d-95e1-e802-fa8f-98708cc2d75b@purtz.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 21.10.20 23:12, David G. Johnston wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 4:25 AM Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker
> <ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org <mailto:ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org>> wrote:
>
> Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz <mailto:michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>>
> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 12:52:17PM +0000, Jürgen Purtz wrote:
> >> The new status of this patch is: Waiting on Author
> >
> > This has not been answered yet, so I have marked the patch as
> returned
> > with feedback.
>
> Updated patch attached, wich reformats the operator lists as requested
> by Jürgen,
>
>
> A couple of things:
>
> One, I would place the equality operator for hash inside a standalone
> synopsis just like all of the others.
ok
> Two, why is hash special in having its create index command provided
> here? (I notice this isn't the fault of this patch but it stands out
> when reviewing it)
yes, this looks odd.
>
> I would suggest rewording hash to look more like the others
ok
> and add a link to the "CREATE INDEX" command from the chapter preamble.
is the link necessary?
>
> and skips the reindentation as suggested by Tom.
>
>
> Agreed
> David J.
--
J. Purtz
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2020-10-23 10:42:07 | Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions |
Previous Message | Ajin Cherian | 2020-10-23 10:10:35 | Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions |