From: | Mike <1100100(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Oliver Fromme <olli(at)lurza(dot)secnetix(dot)de> |
Cc: | Ron St-Pierre <rstpierre(at)syscor(dot)com>, pgsql-novice <pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pgAccess via ssh? |
Date: | 2004-09-03 14:56:16 |
Message-ID: | 8ca42282040903075673532e43@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-novice |
On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 13:09:30 +0200 (CEST), Oliver Fromme
<olli(at)lurza(dot)secnetix(dot)de> wrote:
> However, in that case the DB connection will _not_ be
> through ssh, so it will be unencrypted and insecure.
>
> From Mike's initial mail I got the impression that he
> wanted the connection to the PostgreSQL server to go
> through ssh (which is basically a good thing, because
> you get ssh's authentication and encryption features).
Youch. You're absolutely on the spot. I forgot that by using pgAdmin
directly, I'll be giving up a secured/encrypted connection by way of
ssh. The secured connection is very important. Oh well, I suppose
becoming more proficient with postgresql from the console can't be a
bad thing.
Mike
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Wes | 2004-09-03 14:59:46 | Re: How to determine a database is intact? |
Previous Message | Jim Wilson | 2004-09-03 14:39:05 | Re: "echo"ing a psql command in a bash script |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hari Bhanujan | 2004-09-03 20:53:20 | Re: pgsql functions and transactions? |
Previous Message | Bella.Dumont | 2004-09-03 14:11:42 | PostgreSQL Installation Failure on Solaris 8 |